CAP # 7 feedback

CAP # 7 Feedback
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Points
Title page with the focused clinical question Provided with all information
10 points Provided however not complete
5 points Not provided
0 points The title page and the PICO question are provided with all the necessary information.
9 Points
Clinical relevance statement Clear and concise clinical bottom line from both articles.
20 points Clinical bottom line reported however not clearly stated or lacking information
15 points Clinical bottom line not stated or not clear
10 points The article has a clear and relevant clinical bottom line which postulates that there exists a relationship between balance, attention and postural control among young children aged between 4 and five years. The paper has a clear and concise clinical relevance statement.
20 points
Study summary Comprehensive information provided an article
30 points Most information provided on search—missing one-three items for comprehensive information
25 points Minimal information/detail on specific search
15 points The article provides exhaustive information regarding past studies that have evaluated the impact of visual attention on balance. The paper points out how an occupational therapist can apply the knowledge learned to treat children with sustained attention issues.
28 points
Study appraisal Identification/statement of study strengths as well as threats to validities
25 points Partial statement of study strengths and limitations for both or one article incomplete
20 points Limited statement of study strength and/or threat in both articles
10 points Both the article and the paper have limited information regarding the strengths and weaknesses of the study.

10 points
Proper grammar, use of syntax and delivery of information Consistent use of proper grammar, spelling, syntax and clear delivery of information
10 points One-three errors in spelling, grammar, etc.
5 points More than three errors in spelling, syntax, and grammar
3 points There are a few notable grammar and syntax errors.
5 points
Proper referencing format listed articles (APA or AMA)
Citations in the proper format
5 points More than two APA or format errors
3 points No citation formatting
1 point Proper APA reference but incorrect in-text citation.
3 points
TOTAL 75 points
Comments:
The article chosen is exhaustive regarding existing literature and what future research should. The article contains informative content about the relationship between visual attention and postural tasks among children aged between 4 and five years. The paper’s study summary is exhaustive and goes ahead to relate the topic of study with occupational therapy, but the study appraisal does now cover the strengths and weaknesses of the article. The paper does not document the results of the study.