Order Now

Classifications of Life-Span Development

Category:

No matching category found.

0 / 5. 0

Words: 275

Pages: 1

210

Critical Review of Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman Age Theory
Student
University
Critical Review of Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman Age Theory
Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman (2006) categorize young and middle adulthood based on mental actions associated with age. Individuals are classified by age due to predictable thoughts and behaviors from individuals solely based on age and life expectancy. The context of organizational systems, family structure, and community systems are correlated with biological characteristics to determine the Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman (2006) theory on age; however, Albert Bandura’s Social Learning theory can make improvements to the choices (Bandura, 2001).
The classification depicts young adults as focusing on creating identities within society, and middle adults are focused on sustaining stability within the work and family structure based on evolution. Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman (2006) classify those behaviors as common across various cultures. The responses are predictable and necessary for survival based on a person’s age (Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman, 2006). All humans will experience those theories or else he or she will not survive into adulthood according to methods of evolution. (Bandura, 2001).
The phrases used by Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman (2006) are based on biological factors to explain adulthood phases and ignore the role of society in shaping human behavior through social learning. New categories of adulthood would include specific actions performed in the community and how society views and defines the part of an adult.

Wait! Classifications of Life-Span Development paper is just an example!

In some cultures, and religions, teenagers are expected to marry and have children (Bandura, 2001). The purpose of marriage in teens is not universal across all cultures and would cause teenagers to have developed characters and thoughts due to taking on a mature role in society (Bandura, 2001). Phases will be determined by actions that warrant maturity standards and functions within a specific community.
Individuals according to Albert Bandura (2001) learn from everyday action within society. Individual action within the organization should classify a person’s age because roles associated with age vary from culture to culture (Bandura, 2001). Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman (2006) should account for different cultures within their theories to accurately show the position of society shaping human interaction and behaviors.
References
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of
psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
Zastrow, C., & Kirst-Ashman, K. (2006). Understanding human behavior and the social
environment. Cengage Learning.

Get quality help now

Catherine Pirelli

5.0 (584 reviews)

Recent reviews about this Writer

I’m used to dealing with my papers myself, especially when it goes about reviews, but I just got myself in the situation when a deadline was looming, and I had plenty of other assignments that are no less important. And know what? AnyCustomWriting authors managed to deliver it in 3 hours!

View profile

Related Essays

Ancient World Ethics

Pages: 3

(825 words)

Analysis of The Actor Network Theory

Pages: 5

(1375 words)

anthropology

Pages: 8

(2200 words)

Medicine Admission essay

Pages: 2

(550 words)

The Research And Fraud Case, Enron

Pages: 2

(663 words)

Please check the next column

Pages: 16

(4400 words)

Healthcare Quality

Pages: 6

(1650 words)

Is Bentham a liberal?

Pages: 11

(3025 words)