Essay Of The Social Contract Or Principle Of Political Law

Essay of the Social Contract or Principle of Political Law

Starting with the second book, Rousseau begins with the theme of sovereignty is inalienable. And it can be said, he tells us so that an operate group is essential that they have a general will and that the society that is made up of a necessity which all the people who constitute it suffer and can work to satisfy it. Also, the author tells us that the sovereign can change to master and this can cause the ruin of the political body, and as the people can be affected in it.

Also, it tells us about sovereignty is indivisibility, which means that it cannot be separated since the will has general or given if only part of the people would be. He also mentions that politicians not being able to divide this store initially to divide it by the object as the example that gives us in force and will or legislative power or Executive Power.

Leaving that aside, it also raises that sovereigns are being fantastic beings in addition to having an exact concept of them, each one has a different point of view of politicians or sovereign. In addition to not having a fixed idea of the "law". Here we must mention that the author’s explanation of his analogy of the sovereign being a fantastic being is interesting, as compared to his views to the "charlatans of Japan" so that he describes politicians, but also putting his point ofView is interesting.

The author mentions us, the general will can erra, and this is exposed to us that the will is straight "always" having an utility, however, this does not mean that he can deceive him wanting the "good", so he saysThat there are two kind of wills, it generates it and private interest, in which interest can be joined by forming different interest rates, which can reach a general will where a single opinion dominates about partial or individual associations.

This makes us think and analyze that sometimes the people will be deceived believing that the decision it makes is for their good that is in a way, although there are scattered opinions there will always be a will that dominates the majority about most.

It also tells us about the limits that the sovereign has before his power, he explains that the State has an absolute power over each of the members of society, which calls this "sovereignty". Which mentions us that members must work together to be able to have mutual benefits, as well as the same rights. Since this is made up of each of its members and this is formed by a social contract. In addition to that each citizen seeks to relate to the State seeking benefits between them, as well as not losing their freedom to such acts being protected by him.

As a result of the rest, Rousseau already tells us about what is formed of the social pact, which calls it "law" to the political body that describes it as movement and will through legislation. In addition, from the beginning it tells us that justice comes from a God although we have not realized and a State is needed to impose the laws we require, and this explains that sometimes the laws are so good for bad peopleAnd in good people it has been the bad laws depending on the application of these since each of the individuals applies them in the way that suits them most. In addition to also mentioning that the laws are made up of everyone’s will and that these are applicable to all its members. Rousseau also mentions us that a law cannot be determined only by the mandate of a sovereign since this could be called dictatorship, however, these laws govern the people and these are applied through a "legislator".

Retaking from the last point that Rousseau told us;In this chapter he will tell us about the legislator and they mention us that from this point society needs someone who has a "superior" intelligence that could deal with ourselves and this describes it as a God who can occupy the laws of man. It also tells us that the legislator is not related to the Empire and that he cannot send men since laws as he describes are his passion. Rousseau does not mention a series of difficulties that could be found;One of these tells us that it is because of the scope of its strength, to what it refers to what each government has its own strategy for their own interest, however they must impose good laws so that a people can appreciate them and maximize the ones for himScope of your policy. Rousseau tells us about a God so that individuals can follow the laws and can obey in a consequent way.

Likewise, he mentions that the people are explained in this section on how to observe the capacities and characteristics that the people have at the time of imposing or writing certain laws that the legislator sends, and this is what must be analyzed so as not to commit theThe same mistakes that have always been committed, because when the peoples begin to grow or expand these are difficult to control or discipline, because they have certain customs acquired throughout history and one of those is the violence thathas been instilled since previous times. He also mentions that we seek freedom and that we must have maturity. As well as the legislation that is changing according to time, it matures.

What is passing time, as well as in nature, states have a better constitution to what they have certain limits, it also puts us as an explanation of a small people is normally the strongest than a large one taking into account a linkthat unites them socially. To which he also explains that errors can be found in the empires when they want. This makes the people or rather citizens suffer several disagreements. So they tell us that in order

For the same reason, we begin to explain what the political body can be measured in two ways the first one can be measured by means of the inhabitants and the second by the number of land, these two are related to man so this is what it is what is whatcomposes a state. It also gives food to men and conflicts between them to obtain it. Therefore, he mentions that the number of land and inhabitants cannot be calculated exactly so it is sometimes insufficient for them in addition to the characteristics of each land;The author mentions that one of these qualities that can be a land can be fertility, production, climate among others, in addition to the fact that they remain in union to be able to protect what he needs as their family or land.

Likewise, it tells us about the issue of the various legislation systems, we reduce freedom and equality to two main things, at the beginning it tells us that the legislation will be freedom because it is one of the many forces that thebody of the State and on the other hand there is equality because without freedom this will not be able to live without it.

Therefore, it does not speak of civil freedom regarding equality and understand that this is not related between wealth and power but in the virtue of the laws and referring to wealth because it tells us, each inhabitant is not worth more than anotherand that none of these gets to have to sell;And this in reality is not as they raise it. So each State has its own system, and this has led to deception and falsehoods, so that a State and its participants go down.

Similarly, speaking of the division of law. Since the members between the two are also related to the State, in this relationship the civil laws born, of how man must take care of his independence, but without forgetting his relationship the society that surrounds him. In addition to having a relationship between man and law, so his indiscipline and criminals break the relationship created a bad relationship.