Euthanasia From The Ethical Point Of View

Euthanasia from the ethical point of view

Many of us have the idea of the concept of euthanasia as a suicide said in different words, however, society has created the term "suicide" an idea sufficiently immoral or aggressive to move it away from the main ideal of euthanasia, which whichIt is to bring the terminals to a direct and painless death, so that they do not have to suffer a long period of time with a disease that will take them, sooner or later, to the same result as euthanasia (death).

The Congress of the Republic through a discussion that will be carried out in a couple of days, will seek to make legitimate norms and laws near euthanasia, with which I completely agree due to the way in which ideas and the ideas are embodied order that should be carried out before this act is carried out, things such as providing the right to decent death even to young people who have cognitive capacity to decide clearly and concisely because they want to carry out euthanasia; That is, although there is no hierarchical order established directly from what should be taken into account before a person decides to carry out this act, it is not as simple and as fast as buying something in a store, but that On the contrary, it requires many measures and approval of professionals (as they raise the ideas to be discussed in Congress) that implies that the issue of euthanasia is carried out with such depth and professionalism that it would be impossible for a person to perform such an act.

make without any and/or without being treated and analyzed in depth by professionals who are suitable for it.

I completely agree with euthanasia, only starting from an act of consideration and solidarity such as the famous phrase "put on the shoes of the other".

Imagine you, suffering from a terminal disease which every second that passes increases your pain in a general way in the body, that is when I ask you what would you take into account that there is an exit which leads you to an immediate death without pain withoutsome and completing it completely?, I think that more than one would choose to end that pain and suffering as soon as possible at all costs (I include myself), since sooner or later the same result will be reached, only that an option gives you accelerating the process without any pain without.

Perhaps starting from an ethical point of view, which is to do what each one wants or should do following established norms that define the “correct or incorrect” acts without leaving aside the law that each State possesses, could be classifiedthe act of euthanasia as something incorrect, even following the Catholic ideals;However, if we see it from the moral side, which is defined how to do each one creates correct based on their own criteria, it could be seen as a coherent and correct act due to the problems facing the person in order to seek aFast and feasible solution for this problem.

It could also be said as a point in favor of euthanasia. The fact that the person requires a deep analysis close to why he wants The doctors in charge would come, but you must also work with professionals who deal which inquires about the background of the person and how I suffer from the disease; And touching the issue that children from the age of 6 can decide determined situations, even taking into account something called the “vital testament”, which makes the person express through an act that medical care wants to be carried out if it comes to suffer a terminal disease that does not allow him to express himself in the same.

So yes, my conclusion is that if children from an early age develop sufficient cognitive capacity to expressly express what euthanasia are carried out to end their suffering, which are allowed to do so responsible andtrue, taking into account everything that implies wanting to carry out this act.

And to finish I will quote a doctor who speaks in favor of euthanasia: "It is a long time to extend life and little to avoid suffering to the patient". Gómez Sancho;Completely agree with the phrase, since doctors, for the most part, care that the patient is still alive without even knowing what the patient wants or believes better for him, without taking into account the pain so great that he can implyWanting to prolong the life of a patient with a terminal disease which is known what will lead to the end, violating, to some extent, the right to a dignified life and providing false hopes in the patient.