Film Report

Name
Institution
Course
Date
Film Report-The Revisionary
Introduction
“The Revisionary” is a documentary film detailing the re-election of Mr. Don McLeroy, who was the former chairman of the board of education of Texas. It details the decision of the Board in the determination of textbook contents in influencing the American culture. The essay offers a divulgence views when it comes to looking at the attributes presented by the article entitled Non-overlapping Magisteria. The article details different inquiries presented by both religion and science in the teaching authority. The role of this essay is to elucidate on the presence of political wrangling present in the film, with concrete examples supported by the article.
Overview of the Film
“The Revisionary” represents the coverage of a transformative agenda of the state board of education in Texas in an attempt to revise the school curriculum. Much of the discussions contained in this quest is the revision of textbooks offered in the school curriculum. The suggestion is to the inclusion of religious doctrines in the study course aimed at converting most of the students into the Christian teachings. The storyline concentrates on the political ideologies presented by board officials of an education institution, with the presence of a few conservative members trying to introduce change. Their intention is for their ideological principles to be reflected in the curriculum. It is for this reason that there is the demand for the creationist language in a friendly tone for the advancement of the evolution of Christian teachings.

All these changes are aimed at supporting the capitalist movement associated with social studies.
A Look at Non-overlapping Magisteria
Non-overlapping Magisteria presents an inquiry into facts and the value system between the views of science and religion. It is a representation of divergent views which exists between a legitimate magisterium and the “nets” towards a teaching culture. The support of creationism is evidenced by its homegrown phenomenon of the sociocultural history of the American culture. The support of evolution is amplified by the fact that it has never brought any intellectual trouble. There is the need for consensus between science and religion where churchgoers need to understand that evolution is a true phenomenon that does not contradict religious beliefs. The fact that players involved in the documentary are Christians does not necessarily mean that they cannot support the inclusion of science in the methodology of school teaching. The presence of science and views of creationism are two standpoints that can be equated to the political landscape while vying for key leadership positions.
Central Issues Covered
The film covers a central issue of political wrangles in the election of commissioners who are supposed to make decisions to determine the type of textbooks used in schools. Each state is represented by a large percentage of members, offering an opportunity to make a choice in the decision-making process by the board. The accuracy of this notion lies in the fact that the board is dominated by social-conservative factions whose work is to ensure that the decision of introducing science textbooks is overturned. As observed in the film, there was an imminent success in attaining such a move, especially due to the fact the chairman of the body was a born again Christian. Don McLeroy had a strong stance in the notion of creationism, creating a viable opportunity is opposing views based on science. The argument is that any success in the process of making decisions should be based on concrete views presented by players, rather than regarding any affiliation to a particular political grouping. Christians should be at the central line in accepting views of their counterpart scientists since no views should be considered supreme over others.
Culture Wars
The documentary illustrates the presence of culture in the American democracy. A good example is a conduct of presidential campaigns where voters are presented with lots of information. The documentary presents a perfect example where such cultural wars are brought into perspective, as with the case of existing battles witnessed among candidates for presidential elections. A perfect match of these clashes is presented in the film, this time in the form of numerous battles conducted in meeting rooms in the school setting. The determination of the success of candidates ought to be made based on the ability to make important decisions in the schooling system, rather than selecting an individual based on the political strength of an individual.
The issue of culture wars can be explained further by examining the nature of conflict occurring between liberal and conservative values of the American political system. Understanding culture can be explained further by the nature of debates exercised in the school curricula of the state of Texas. The current transformation of cultural politics has taken shape on issues like gun laws, recreational drug use, privacy, education system, among others.
The presence of culture wars explains the entanglement in the decision-making process at the meeting of Texas board of education. Such an instance is the creation of an existing organization that is conservative in redefining phrases used to permit textbook companies in doing business with schools found in the state of Texas. These conservative findings are presented by both Cynthia Dunbar and Don McLeroy who advocates for the introduction of prejudicial phrasing to undermine theoretical knowledge of evolution. Their implied intention is to allow creationism into the school’s curriculum. The reality is that Christian teachings should be introduced in schools since there is quality information that does not contravene the rule of law. Rather than relying on science, which is also a good rationale, there is the concentration of the doctrine of creationism. The aspect of Christian teachings postulates an increased need to shun racism while at the same time, supporting the love of Christ. Political movements founded on the tenets of church doctrines promotes the belief of faith.
Political Wrangling
Political wrangling presents a scenario where the state board of education has been under constant pressure to undertake some reviews of school’s textbooks. It is through such a move that has brought the attention through the existence of a moral battleground. The same conflict is witnessed between liberals and conservatives in the American political arena. The documentary tries to identify crucial personalities associated with these fights. The intense debate in the film is an important segment in covering instances of compromises and vote trading among members of the board. The documentary illustrates a case of backroom discussions occurring between experts and the board members. The decision-making process is what becomes an interesting phenomenon in arriving at the central idea. The current political system witnesses a case of increased political pressures in trying to outweigh a candidate. In some instances, there are verbal exchanges witnessed as some candidates try to outmaneuver each other for political gains.
The ideological rationale of political wrangles is presented further by the presence of both science and Christian teachings in the debate. Christian perspectives are presented by the board chairman, while Ron Wetherington brings scientists views. Wetherington was basing his ideas from an anthropologist point of view, with much backing from other activists like with the case of Kathy Miller. Miller was representing the religious views. The decision of these individuals represents a variety of ideas offered in a normal process of debating. In such a process, there are numerous agendas which are revisited awaiting the contribution of members.
Any debating process leads to the presence of different views presented by participants. The same applies to all debates involving political initiatives, leading to a case of political disagreements. Similar notions are witnessed in the film, where a majority of views are made following the interjection of the board in making their submissions to the debate. There is a scenario where the opinion of the board was presented in a casual way, especially when it required the inclusion of additions to be made on the textbook for social studies. A reference to these additions was made about the leadership of Ronald Reagan which advocated for the restoration of national confidence. Such a clause offers valid arguments on the need to restore the economic boom of America, the industrial revolution, and increased accomplishment in leadership. The truth is that Americans are given an opportunity to be confidence enough while solving their problems.
CriticismThe political landscape found in the film exemplifies on interviewing candidates with partisan views. Concerned parties presented their ideas in a balanced approach, while at the same time supporting the scientist’s viewpoint. An example is a submission by Mr. Thurman where he ridiculed the commissioners, creating an embarrassment had it not been the intervention of some members. Such an issue portrays the political grouping by the board members in an attempt to capture more seats in the board.
There have been some views about the presence of wars between religion and science. However, this is not always the case. These views are supported by the fact that the theory of evolution opposes the aspect of Christianity. On a different point of view, Christianity does not oppose evolution in any way. For this reason, these two instances present divergent views about each other. The truth of the matter is that Catholic teachings value scientific findings with no apparent views of threat presented by the existence of science.
The teaching authority, which is called magisterium, portrays the church to offer various examples in understanding both science and religion. Both teachings present the principle resolution of creating warfare, and this is what has been under the headline of political wrangling in the essay. The aspect of warfare is seen to exist between religion and science, but this is an issue that should not have occurred in the first place. Each subject offers a legitimate cause for magisterium in the teaching authority, and none should be ignored at the benefit of the other. In essence, the two principles do not overlap, hence the headline non-overlapping magisteria.
Conclusion
The Revolutionary is a film Detailing the political landscape leading to the re-election of Mr. Don McLeroy. It offers a decision rule of the state board of education in determining the content to use for textbooks in the state of Texas. The film is expounded further by the inclusion of the article entitled Non-overlapping Magisteria in offering different inquiries of religion and science in the teaching system. The overview of the film covers the transformative agenda while introducing a revised content in the school teaching. A look at the article called non-overlapping magisteria presents an analysis of both creationism and science and their related influence in the school teaching. Central issues covered in this essay touches on the existing political wrangles in the decision of the board and the attributes of culture wars associated with presidential campaigns at the electioneering period. Some of the criticisms offered explains the rationale why both views of creationism and science should thrive in the society since concrete evidence support them in the theory of evolution.