Final Trading Report

Final Trading Report
The Investment Strategies
A guideline was followed to make sure that the investment strategies are followed strictly. This guideline is discussed below-
Portfolio Risk and Diversification
Moderate risks will be taken while managing the portfolio. Neither aggressive investment nor completely risk averse strategies will be followed here. As mentioned earlier, the portfolio will contain stocks, bonds, and cash or cash equivalent assets. In order to achieve further diversification, we will allocate our combination of assets across several industries, so that the high risk of one asset can be compensated by the lower risk of another asset. To achieve this, first we will determine the proper allocation of securities in the portfolio.
Once the portfolio will be designed as per our plans, we will divide our capital between the security classes. Afterwards, we will reassess the weightings of the portfolio every week, based on its performance, and also depending on the conditions of the market. This way, we will make sure that appropriate ‘rebalancing strategies’ are implemented all through the duration of the portfolio. We also have to think about the tax implications while implementing our investment strategies. In addition to that, we should use different positions and options in a timely manner in order to take full advantage of them. All in all, we must keep in mind that if our portfolio is well-diversified (across security classes and industries), it will ensure considerable amount of growth and return on the investment.

Diversification will also shield the portfolio against the risks associated with individual securities, structural changes, and large declines in the market. On top of that, we have to be quick and flexible enough to make adjustments in the weightings of the portfolio whenever needed. We believe, sticking to these basic investment strategies will enhance our chances of securing great returns.
Moreover, we will keep a close eye on the market in order to find out the most lucrative industries, and we will investment in those industries accordingly. As mentioned, instead of investing it all in just one industry, we will spread our investment across several industries. The benefits of this diversification have already been discussed earlier. We must not forget that basic technical analysis of both an industry and its key players is extremely necessary at this point. We can’t just base our investment decision on expert opinions. We also have to conduct our own technical analysis. There are a lot firms operating in an industry. As a result, we must carefully analyze the financial information of our chosen companies, along with their policies for retained earnings and dividends. We also have to analyze their beta, alpha, key financial ratios, Treynor Measure, Sharpe Ratio etc.
We will keep our investment strategies quite simple. We will not invest in an industry or a business that we do not understand. If we do that, it will lead to us wasting our valuable time processing information that are out of our comprehension. This will result in bad or poor investment decisions. So we will refrain from doing that. And if we see a good investment opportunity after conducting our technical analysis, we will invest in it as soon as possible in order to make the most out of it.
Investment Research on Yahoo! Inc. Stock
For this analysis, we have selected Yahoo! Inc. As of November 16, 2016, the company’s stock price was $ 40.19. The graph below shows the movements in this stock’s price for the last 3 months-

Basic Information about the Stock
Yahoo! Inc.’s stock currently has a beta of 2.09, which seems pretty higher than the standard range of beta (from 0.5 to 1.5). In the last 1 year, the stock price moved by 22.96 % in NASDAQ, and S&P 500 reported a 4.71 % Change in its price during the same period. During the last 52 weeks, Yahoo’s stock price went up as high as $ 44.92, and went down as low as $ 26.15. In addition, the stock’s last ‘200-Day Moving Average’ was $ 40.24 (“YHOO Key Statistics | Yahoo! Inc. Stock”, 2016). Almost 8 % of the company’s stocks are being held by individual investors like Sam, and another 71 % are owned by different corporate investors.
Yahoo! Inc. Market Capitalization
According to Natividad (2013), if an investor wishes his investment in a company to grow gradually, then he must invest in a business that has a market capitalization of minimum $ 150 million. Yahoo’s current market capitalization is more than $ 39,000 million, which indicates that the company is not illiquid, and it has good growth potential (“YHOO Key Statistics | Yahoo! Inc. Stock”, 2016). In this regard, the Yahoo stock is a good investment option.
Consistency in EPS (Earning Per Share)
Another precondition for a stock to be a preferred investment option is its constant growth in earnings. Natividad (2013) mentioned that a company must show yearly increase in its EPS for a period of 5 years in order to be considered as a good investment option. NASDAQ data shows that from 2012 to 2016 fiscal years, Yahoo’s EPS were $ 0.8, $ 3.3, $ 1.3, $ 7.5, and -$ 4.6 (“Yahoo! Inc. Common Stock (YHOO)”, 2016). Here, we can observe that there is no trend or pattern in the company’s EPS growth or decline. This makes the stock’s earning potentials a bit unpredictable.
Last 2 Quarters’ EPS Growth Compare to Long-term EPS Growth
Companies that experience higher growth rate in its EPS relative to its historical EPS growth rate, are considered lucrative by the investors (Natividad, 2013). In the last 2 quarters, Yahoo’s earnings grew by 2200 % and 113 % respectively even though the company’s past 5 years’ earnings growth rate was -12.3 % (“Yahoo! Inc. Common Stock (YHOO)”, 2016). This current rise in its earnings makes Yahoo a very good investment option for Sam.
The PSR (Price to Sales Ratio)
Picardo (2016) said that the PSR is one kind of valuation ratio, which shows the comparison between the company’s revenues and its share prices. The ratio is calculated by dividing the company’s total market capitalization by its total revenues. If a company’s PSR ratio is lower than the industry average that means its stock is underpriced and vice versa. Ideally, any company’s PSR should be less than 1.5. In 2015, Yahoo’s market capitalization was around $ 40 billion, and the company’s sales revenue was $ 4.98 billion (“YHOO Key Statistics | Yahoo! Inc. Stock”, 2016). This gives us a PSR of 8.03 (40 / 4.98) for the company, which is way more than 1.5. However, the industry average is also just over 8.5. As a result, Yahoo’s stocks are not overpriced.
Low Debt to Equity Ratio
For the last 10 years, Yahoo has always managed to maintain a very low debt to equity ratio. The company’s current D/E ratio is 0.04, which shows the company’s heavy reliance on equity financing (“Growth, Profitability, and Financial Ratios for Yahoo! Inc (YHOO)”, 2016). This indicates Yahoo’s positive financial strength.
Current Ratio
According to Morningstar, the company’s current ratio is 6.14 that illustrates Yahoo’s strong financial position and very strong liquidity (“Growth, Profitability, and Financial Ratios for Yahoo! Inc (YHOO)”, 2016). This also makes it a good investment option for Sam.
ROE and ROA
From 2011 to 2015, Yahoo’s Return on Equity were 8.36 %, 29.12 %, 9.89 %, 29.03 %, and – 12.86 %. During the same period, the company’s Return on Assets were 7.06 %, 24.75 %, 8.06 %, 19.10 %, and – 8.14 % (“Growth, Profitability, and Financial Ratios for Yahoo! Inc (YHOO)”, 2016). Both ROA and ROE do not show any particular pattern. This makes the company’s return possibilities a bit unpredictable.
From the above discussion, it is apparent that overall the Yahoo stock is a good investment choice for Sam and any other individual investor. Although, some of the indicators used in this report show some drawbacks of the Yahoo stock, but most of them show positive results. Consequently, I have chosen to include Yahoo in our portfolio.
Comparison of the Optimized Weights of the Portfolio to the Actual Weights in the First Week
As mentioned above, diversification is the key to minimize the risks of a portfolio and also to make sure that the portfolio earns the best possible returns. Due to lack of experience, our first week’s portfolio was not spread across different types of assets. Rather, it solely focused on equities or stocks from different industries. However, since the beginning, we tried to invest in the stocks with the highest earning possibilities. The table below shows the weights of different securities in the first week-
Weights of different securities in the first week
Rank Security Issuer Stock or Bond? % out of Portfolio
1 Southwest Airlines Co. Stock 17.34 %
2 General Electric Company Stock 14.01 %
3 ACRE Realty Investors Inc. Stock 9.70 %
4 ProShares UltraShort S&P 500 Stock 9.45 %
5 Exxon Mobil Corporation Stock 8.94 %
And the table below will depict the optimized weights of our portfolio-
Optimized weights of our portfolio
Rank Security Issuer Stock or Bond? % out of Portfolio
1 CVS Caremark Corporation Stock 20 %
2 Twitter Inc. Stock 10.56 %
3 Royal Dutch Shell plc Stock 25.13 %
4 Apple Inc. Stock 9.61 %
5 ACRE Realty Investors Inc. Stock 9.70 %
6 Credit Suisse – 6.0% – Feb 2018 Bond 10 %
7 Atlas Air Worlwide – 7.200% – Jul 2020 Bond 10 %
8 GOLD 1 OZ – DEC 16 Cash or Cash Equivalent 5 %
From the table above, we can observe that our optimized portfolio is well-diversified among different industries. On top of that, it also includes the optimized weight allocation among different types of assets. This was done in order to minimize the risks of the portfolio. Unlike our portfolio in the first week, the optimized portfolio contains different other types of assets. To select each asset, and to determine their appropriate weight, we have observed the price movements of these assets all through the last 9 weeks. We also researched expert predictions to find out which assets in our portfolio have the highest earning potentials. This is how we have come up with this combination of weights for our portfolio.
A Summary of the Performance Measurement and Comparison to Our Benchmark Performance
We have already calculated the weekly returns of our portfolio. From those returns, we have also calculated the total average return of our portfolio during the last 8 weeks (2 months). Then, we have chosen NASDAQ as our benchmark. The following graph will illustrate the performance of our portfolio compared to NASDAQ’s performance-

The graph above shows that while NASDAQ’s performance over the last 8 weeks or 2 months has been pretty consistent, Sam’s portfolio experienced some dramatic ups and downs. NASDAQ returns ranged from 3.5 to 6 percent during this period. On the other hand, the return of Sam’s portfolio went up as high as almost 200 percent, and dropped as low as -77 percent. In that sense, Sam’s portfolio has pretty volatile. However, our portfolio yielded much higher returns compared to NASDAQ’s return. Over the last 12 months, NASDAQ yielded a return of + 9.75 % (“Total Returns – NASDAQ”, 2016). On the contrary, Sam’s portfolio earned an average return of + 34.85 % during the last 2 months or 8 weeks.
Portfolio Beta
Currently, Sam’s portfolio contains 8 untraded securities. Two of them are bonds, and one is cash equivalent (gold). As a result, we will calculate the beta of the portfolio based on the 5 untraded stocks. We will keep the beta calculation pretty simple. First we will determine the respective weight of each equity, then we will collect the betas of each equity from credible sources such as Google Finance, NASDAQ or Morningstar. Finally, we will calculate the weighted average beta of the portfolio. So, the formula to calculate the portfolio’s beta is as follows-
Beta = (Visa Inc. weight * Visa Inc. beta) + (Yahoo! Inc. weight * Yahoo! Inc. beta) + (Amerigas Partners lp weight * Amerigas Partners lp beta) + (Starbucks Corporation weight * Starbucks Corporation beta) + (Tesla Motors Inc. weight * Tesla Motors Inc. beta)
= (18.88 % * 0.98) + (9.56 % * 1.32) + (10.68 % * 1.04) + (25.89 % * 0.8) + (9.73 % * 0.84)
= 0.19 + 0.13 + 0.11 + 0.21 + 0.08
= 0.72
So, we can see that the portfolio’s beta is 0.72, which is well inside the standard beta range (from 0.5 to 1.5).
Treynor Measure
Finally, we want to see how well our portfolio has performed based on an expert-suggested measure. To keep things simple, we will use the ‘Reward to Volatility Ratio’, which is also known as the ‘Treynor Measure.’ According to Pareto (2016), Jack Treynor was the pioneer in coming up with an easy and holistic measure in order to evaluate the performance of a portfolio. This measure is holistic, because it also incorporates the risks associated with the portfolio. This measure can be applied to any kind of portfolio, irrespective of the individual risk preferences of different types of investors. According to Treynor, a portfolio has 2 kinds of risks. They are- risks stemming from the market fluctuations, and risks associated with individual assets in the portfolio. In this regard, the notion of ‘SML or Security Market Line’ was introduced by Treynor. This line shows the link between the returns of both the market and the portfolio. In addition to that, the slope of this line (or the ‘beta’) shows how volatile the portfolio is in relation to the market. As a result, the greater this slope is, the better the portfolio performs in terms of the tradeoff between risk and return. The Treynor measure is calculated using the following formula-
Treynor Measure = (Portfolio Return – Risk-Free Rate) / Beta
The denominator of this formula shows the total market risk of the portfolio, and the numerator shows the portfolio’s risk premium. Here, we should keep in mind that a portfolio can be identified as a ‘good’ portfolio if it scores high in the Treynor Measure (Pareto, 2016). Keeping all these in mind, let us calculate the Treynor Measure score of Sam’s portfolio. We have already calculated the return and beta of the portfolio. And for the risk-free rate, we will use the “10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Rate”. Currently, the rate is 2.32 %. So, the calculation of Sam’s portfolio’s Treynor measure score is as follows-
Sam’s portfolio Treynor Measure = (34.85 % – 2.32 %) / 0.72
= (0.3485 – 0.0232) / 0.72
= 0.5
So, the portfolio’s Treynor Measure score is 0.5, which is not that high, but not that low either. Rather, it is within the standard Treynor Measure score according to Pareto (2016). From this analysis, we can state that Sam’s portfolio performed rather well.
Sharpe Ratio
The Sharpe ratio is calculated using the following formula:
Sharpe ratio = (Expected return of the portfolio – Risk-free rate) / Standard deviation of portfolio return
We already know the Expected return of Sam’s portfolio (34.85 %), and the Risk-free rate (2.32 %) from the above calculation of the Treynor measure. And by using the STDEV.S formula on MS Excel, we have also calculated the Standard deviation of portfolio return, which 87.63 %. So now, let us calculate Sam’s portfolio’s Sharpe ratio.
Sam’s portfolio Sharpe Ratio = (34.85 % – 2.32 %) / 87.63 %
= 0.37
The general rule is, a Sharpe ratio of equal to or more than 1 means a good risk-adjusted portfolio. But Sam’s portfolio’s Sharpe ratio is way below the standard score. In that sense, we can say that this is not a good risk-adjusted portfolio. As a result, this might harm the returns of the portfolio in the long run.
Jensen Measure or Alpha
Now, we will calculate the portfolio’s alpha. It is also known as the Jensen Measure. The alpha is calculated by using the following formula:
Alpha = Portfolio Return – CAPM
So, we need to calculate the portfolio’s CAPM first. The CAPM formula is as follows:
CAPM = Risk-Free Rate + Beta (Market Return – Risk-Free Rate)
We already calculated the Beta of the portfolio. We also know the risk-free rate and the market return. Therefore, the portfolio’s CAPM is;
CAPM = 2.32 + 0.72 (9.75 – 2.32)
= 7.67 %
Taking this CAPM value, the portfolio’s alpha is calculated below:
Alpha = 34.85 – 7.67
= 27.18 %
So in terms of Jensen Measure or Alpha, we can see that our portfolio has done really well.
Conclusion
In the report above, we analyzed Sam’s portfolio. Here, we talked about how the investment strategies were implemented for the portfolio. We also conducted a written investment research on one of the selected security (Yahoo! Inc.) from the portfolio. Then, we presented a written report on the comparison of the optimized weights of our investments to the actual weights in the first week. And finally, the report provided a summary of the performance measurement and a comparison to our benchmark performance.
The above discussion shows that Sam’s portfolio performed well in terms of returns (during the past 9 weeks), and also in terms of most of the other measures and comparisons. On top of that, the portfolio’s overall average return was higher than that of the market (NASDAQ). As mentioned earlier, because of lack of experience, it was not possible to achieve portfolio diversity to the full extent, but the assets were well-diversified across equities from different lucrative industries. But it was not that much diversified if we talk about the different types of securities or assets that are required to spread or minimize the risks of a portfolio. It was heavily reliant on the security market mostly. Maybe because of that, we have experienced some radical ups and downs in the portfolio returns during the last 2 months. However, in the end, Sam’s portfolio managed to earn an average return of 34.85 %, which is a very good return.
References
10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Rate. (2016). Fred.stlouisfed.org. Retrieved 1 December 2016, from https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DGS10
Growth, Profitability, and Financial Ratios for Yahoo! Inc (YHOO). (2016). Morningstar. Retrieved 30 November 2016, from http://financials.morningstar.com/ratios/r.html?t=YHOO
Natividad, G. (2013). Multidivisional Strategy and Investment Returns. Journal Of Economics & Management Strategy, 22(3), 594-616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jems.12018
Pareto, C. (2016). Measure Your Portfolio’s Performance. Investopedia. Retrieved 1 December 2016, from http://www.investopedia.com/articles/08/performance-measure.asp
Picardo, E. (2016). Price-To-Sales Ratio – PSR. Investopedia. Retrieved 30 November 2016, from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/price-to-salesratio.asp
Total Returns – NASDAQ. (2016). Nasdaq. Retrieved 30 November 2016, from http://www.nasdaq.com/markets/indices/nasdaq-total-returns.aspx
Yahoo! Inc. Common Stock (YHOO). (2016). NASDAQ. Retrieved 30 November 2016, from http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/yhoo
YHOO Key Statistics | Yahoo! Inc. Stock. (2016). Yahoo Finance. Retrieved 30 November 2016, from https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/YHOO/key-statistics?p=YHOO
Appendix
Weekly Trading Reports
Week # 1
Group Members: ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
Your Planned Asset Allocation: Stock % ــــ
Bond % ـــــ
Cash and Others % ــــــ
———————————————————————————————————————
Period: From 16/09/2016TO 19/09/2016
Your Portfolio Value at the beginning of the week (Monday) is:
Your Portfolio Value at the end of the week (Friday) is:
Your Actual Asset Allocation by the end of the week (based on the closing position on Friday):
Stock __ %
Bond __ %
Cash and Others __ %
Your Top 10 Holdings by the end of the week (Friday):
Rank Security Issuer Stock or Bond? Unit Price Shares Total $ Value % out of Portfolio
1 Southwest Airlines Co. Stock $ 36.84 5000 $ 184,200 17.34 %
2 General Electric Company Stock $ 29.75 5000 $ 148,750 14.01 %
3 ACRE Realty Investors Inc. Stock $ 1.03 100000 $ 103,000 9.70 %
4 ProShares UltraShort S&P 500 Stock $ 16.73 6000 $ 100,380 9.45 %
5 Exxon Mobil Corporation Stock $ 82.59 1150 $ 94,978.50 8.94 %
Week # 2
Group Members: ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
Your Planned Asset Allocation: Stock % ــــ
Bond % ـــــ
Cash and Others % ــــــ
———————————————————————————————————————
Period: From 26/09/2016TO 30/09/2016
Your Portfolio Value at the beginning of the week (Monday) is:
Your Portfolio Value at the end of the week (Friday) is:
Your Actual Asset Allocation by the end of the week (based on the closing position on Friday):
Stock __ %
Bond __ %
Cash and Others __ %
Your Top 10 Holdings by the end of the week (Friday):
Rank Security Issuer Shares Stock or Bond? Unit Price Total $ Value % out of Portfolio
1 Tempur Sealy International Inc. 4000 Equities $ 57.67 $ 230,680.00 20.69 %
2 Wells Fargo & Co. 5000 Equities $ 45.17 $ 225,850.00 20.26 %
3 Royal Dutch Shell plc 4000 Equities $ 53.37 $ 213,480.00 19.15 %
4 Omega Protein Corporation 5000 Equities $ 23.37 $ 116,850.00 10.48 %
5 Novavax Inc. 50000 Equities $ 2.17 $ 108,500.00 9.73 %
6 Exxon Mobil Corporation 1150 Equities $ 86.85 $ 99,877.50 8.96 %
7 ProShares UltraShort S&P500 6000 Equities $ 16.48 $ 98,880.00 8.87 %
8 Credit Suisse – 6.0% – Feb 2018 10 Bonds $ 1,052.67 $ 10,526.70 0.94
9 Atlas Air Worlwide – 7.200% – Jul 2020 10 Bonds $ 1,005.00 $ 10,050.00 0.90
Week # 3
Group Members: ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
Your Planned Asset Allocation: Stock % ــــ
Bond % ـــــ
Cash and Others % ــــــ
———————————————————————————————————————
Period: From 03/10/2016 TO 09/10/2016
Your Portfolio Value at the beginning of the week (Monday) is:
Your Portfolio Value at the end of the week (Friday) is:
Your Actual Asset Allocation by the end of the week (based on the closing position on Friday):
Stock __ %
Bond__ %
Cash and Others __ %
Your Top 10 Holdings by the end of the week (Friday):
Rank Security Issuer Shares Stock or Bond? Unit Price Total $ Value % out of Portfolio
1 Facebook Inc. 500 Equities $ 128.36 $ 64,180 100 %
Week # 4
Group Members: ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
Your Planned Asset Allocation: Stock % ــــ
Bond % ـــــ
Cash and Others % ــــــ
———————————————————————————————————————
Period: From 10/10/2016TO 14/10/2016
Your Portfolio Value at the beginning of the week (Monday) is:
Your Portfolio Value at the end of the week (Friday) is:
Your Actual Asset Allocation by the end of the week (based on the closing position on Friday):
Stock __ %
Bond __ %
Cash and Others __ %
Your Top 10 Holdings by the end of the week (Friday):
Rank Security Issuer Shares Stock or Bond? Unit Price Total $ Value % out of Portfolio
1 Wells Fargo & Co. 5000 Equities $ 44.94 $ 224,700.00 12.29 %
2 Twitter Inc. 13000 Equities $ 17.07 $ 221,910.00 12.13 %
3 Royal Dutch Shell plc 4000 Equities $ 54.76 $ 219,040.00 11.98 %
4 Apple Inc. 1800 Equities $ 117.86 $ 212,148.00 11.60 %
5 Tempur Sealy International Inc. 4000 Equities $ 52.51 $ 210,040.00 11.48 %
6 Novavax Inc. 100000 Equities $ 1.58 $ 158,000.00 8.64 %
7 Nike Inc. 3000 Equities $ 52.22 $ 156,660.00 8.57 %
8 Omega Protein Corporation 5000 Equities $ 23.05 $ 115,250.00 6.30 %
9 xG Technology Inc. 200000 Equities $ 0.48 $ 96,000.00 5.25 %
10 MagneGas Corp 110000 Equities $ 0.70 $ $ 77,000 4.21 %
Week # 5
Group Members: ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
Your Planned Asset Allocation: Stock % ــــ
Bond % ـــــ
Cash and Others % ــــــ
———————————————————————————————————————
Period: From 17/10/2016TO 21/10/2016
Your Portfolio Value at the beginning of the week (Monday) is:
Your Portfolio Value at the end of the week (Friday) is:
Your Actual Asset Allocation by the end of the week (based on the closing position on Friday):
Stock __ %
Bond __ %
Cash and Others __ %
Your Top 10 Holdings by the end of the week (Friday):
Rank Security Issuer Shares Stock or Bond? Unit Price Total $ Value % out of Portfolio
1 Apple Inc. 1800 Equities $ 118.23 $ 212,814.00 12.82 %
2 Twitter Inc. 10000 Equities $ 17.18 $ 171,800.00 10.35 %
3 Bank of America Corporation 10000 Equities $ 16.67 $ 166,700.00 10.04 %
4 Tesla Motors Inc. 800 Equities $ 201.79 $ 161,432.00 9.73 %
5 Chevron Corporation 1500 Equities $ 100.37 $ 150,555.00 9.07 %
6 General Electric Company 5000 Equities $ 28.83 $ 144,150.00 8.69 %
Week # 6
Group Members: ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
Your Planned Asset Allocation: Stock % ــــ
Bond % ـــــ
Cash and Others % ــــــ
———————————————————————————————————————
Period: From 24/10/2016TO 28/10/2016
Your Portfolio Value at the beginning of the week (Monday) is:
Your Portfolio Value at the end of the week (Friday) is:
Your Actual Asset Allocation by the end of the week (based on the closing position on Friday):
Stock __ %
Bond __ %
Cash and Others __ %
Your Top 10 Holdings by the end of the week (Friday):
Rank Security Issuer Shares Stock or Bond? Unit Price Total $ Value % out of Portfolio
1 Twitter Inc. 10000 Equities $ 17.67 $ 176,700.00 21.41 %
2 Apple Inc. 1500 Equities $ 115.01 $ 172,515.00 20.90 %
3 Bank of America Corporation 10000 Equities $ 16.95 $ 169,500.00 20.54 %
4 Chevron Corporation 1500 Equities $ 101.06 $ 151,590.00 18.37 %
5 CVS Caremark Corporation 1000 Equities $ 69.83 $ 69,830.00 8.46 %
6 Nike Inc. 1000 Equities $ 50.20 $ 50,200.00 6.08 %
Week # 7
Group Members: ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
Your Planned Asset Allocation: Stock % ــــ
Bond % ـــــ
Cash and Others % ــــــ
———————————————————————————————————————
Period: From 31/10/2016TO 04/11/2016
Your Portfolio Value at the beginning of the week (Monday) is:
Your Portfolio Value at the end of the week (Friday) is:
Your Actual Asset Allocation by the end of the week (based on the closing position on Friday):
Stock __%
Bond __ %
Cash and Others __%
Your Top 10 Holdings by the end of the week (Friday):
Rank Security Issuer Shares Stock or Bond? Unit Price Total $ Value % out of Portfolio
1 Royal Dutch Shell plc 3500 Equities $ 52.42 $ 183,470.00 25.13 %
2 Novavax Inc. 80000 Equities $ 1.34 $ 107,200.00 14.68 %
3 Twitter Inc. 4000 Equities $ 19.28 $ 77,120.00 10.56 %
4 Nike Inc. 1000 Equities $ 50.32 $ 50,320.00 6.89 %
5 GOLD 1 OZ DEC 16 11 Futures $ 1,299.80 $ 14,297.80 1.96 %
Week # 8
Group Members: ــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
Your Planned Asset Allocation: Stock % ــــ
Bond % ـــــ
Cash and Others % ــــــ
———————————————————————————————————————
Period: From 07/11/2016TO 11/11/2016
Your Portfolio Value at the beginning of the week (Monday) is:
Your Portfolio Value at the end of the week (Friday) is:
Your Actual Asset Allocation by the end of the week (based on the closing position on Friday):
Stock __ %
Bond __ %
Cash and Others __ %
Your Top 10 Holdings by the end of the week (Friday):
Rank Security Issuer Shares Stock or Bond? Unit Price Total $ Value % out of Portfolio
1 Starbucks Corporation 2000 Equities $ 54.40 $ 108,800.00 25.89 %
2 Visa Inc. 1000 Equities $ 79.35 $ 79,350.00 18.88 %
3 CVS Caremark Corporation 1000 Equities $ 75.06 $ 75,060.00 17.86 %
4 xG Technology Inc. 200000 Equities $ 0.36 $ 72,000.00 17.13 %
5 Amerigas Partners lp 1000 Equities $ 44.90 $ 44,900.00 10.68 %
6 Yahoo! Inc. 1000 Equities $ 40.19 $ 40,190.00 9.56 %