Good Living Vs Globalization Field Of Operations: Pandemia

Good living vs Globalization Field of Operations: Pandemia

Introduction

For this essay I want. A contrast between both. In the why? If both show such viable options because they do not apply if they are present many generations ago. Globalization, individualistic, frivolous, consumerist, unequal. Good living, collective, human, minimalist and coexisting. Good living faces globalization in this pandemic at its expression.

Throughout this essay I will answer these questions, and I will ask me as you could really develop good living and how globalization is not as beneficial as we think, however, as it has always opened its way to eachcrisis

Developing

Let us relate to it as a benefit or not globalization is a network that generates strong interdependencies and interconnections that in one way or another, is necessary for current international relations (at least before pandemic) work and the international economy remains afloat. Together with globalization, a consumerist and individualistic culture is intertwined, applying good living with its proposals to a certain minimalist and collective proposals with its roots based on indigenous reserves philosophies of a specific zone is unaccusable before something so large and with aculture as standard as globalization.

The same for which I have adapted worldwide at the world and that despite the worldwide circumstances it has always evolved in a new generation such as prior to the pandemic we studied the fourth generation of globalization, who weensures that there will be no fifth generation of it or it will be that good living becomes the viable model thus eradicating the passage to the fifth generation of globalization.

However, this does not mean that globalization does not have failures or that good living is irrelevant or unnecessary on the contrary. The fast expansion and propagation of this virus only evidenced the level of interconnection that is handled worldwide, and this throughout that it has been developed has also evidenced how the capitalist models of many world powers are not effective as well assupposes that development must be, efficient.

Something that good living has always stressed. Not essentially because a country is a world power, it means that its policies have perfect, that there are no minorities or that its population benefits homogeneously, that a country is developed, does not imply that it does not depend on others to continue being afloat and thesepoints in my opinion have always been ignored because the model "works".

This pandemic has evidenced all these failures, all those errors that were omitted, has demonstrated as the world powers have failed their calculations and since globalization does not end up being so beneficial after all, even for developed countries.

So that it is proved that after all, good living is not so wrong when wanting to promote values, wanting people to think collectively and not individual to generate and produce only what is necessary that after all thatIt is what the nations proceed to do after a crisis to recover from it, cut expenses I must consume only what is necessary to make a damage count and eliminate the failures and who assures us that globalization was not one of these.

Throughout history it has been shown that after a crisis a process of globalization is coming and in my opinion the good living could have prominence, if it were able to configure a bit what sometimes establishes so radically, or perhaps to develop it in a strategic way, to support crises and get out of them, manufacturing and consuming the resources generated in the same country and cutting a little commercial relations with countries of which we export unnecessary products orthat are already in it, stop seeing the unique option and promoting values in the town so that it is thought to be collectively.

In spite of all this in my opinion, good living is not currently developed enough to adopt it immediately as a model to configure international relations and apply it as a viable way to get out of the global crisis generated by this pandemic, for me itThere is a lot of more development of ideas both social, political and economic.

The above does not suggest that it does not have wonderful initiatives such as being in harmony and coexisting with the environment and making it a priority on the international agenda or thinking collectively in my opinion could be viable, since individualism is a goodOption only for those who have the media and for those who are not, it is not even an option, humanize more, since before pandemics and crisis as great as this, the union is the one that helps us to overcome it quickly.

In my opinion, the possibility of giving enough attention to good living in the future would perhaps a little geopolitical teenThey generate worldwide, they are issues of great weight and that have transcended throughout history as well as globalization which have always in the other way have known and evolve over time I do not believe that this pandemic or goodLiving is what is needed to stop this happening.

conclusion

As soon as addressed above, it is possible to think that a new generation of globalization is reached, since this and the great capitalist powers have always opened their passage to evolution, correct the errors that they evidenced in the crisis and adapt toThe new situations that the pandemic leaves in its path, however I do not believe that it ceases to be unequal and beneficial only for certain sectors of the population.

In conclusion, good living could reach some point to be applicable, but with the reality to which we face it I do not think it is the most sensible option taking into account that neither the same governments of the indigenous reserves from which theThey apply, perhaps one day becomes developing and becoming a viable and necessary option to configure international relations, however, at the moment, it is not sufficiently developed to deal with this pandemic.

Bibliography

• Cryptocurrencies and economy. (2020) Globalization, Coronavirus and Economic Collapse Do the supplies chains break? [Video [: https: // www.Youtube.com/watch?V = FF252B_AFDM
• Good Living TV. (2016) Dialogues of Good Living with José Mujica. [Video [: https: // www.Youtube.com/watch?V = 91Nenm93xyg
• RT in Spanish. (2019) End of globalization? The WTO alerts about the reduction of global trade. [Video [: https: // www.Youtube.com/watch?V = E5H3WUH5SRK