Hidden/Implicit Bias

Student
Professor
Course
Date
Implicit Bias
I began off with the Gender Career Test. The IAT online results that I have found depicts a male is on the left side and female on the right side. Personally, I do not feel these outcomes are predictable with my real states of mind about gender and career. I am consummately mindful that both male and female can carry out any occupation, regardless of whether a person will be a chief executive of an organization or a homemaker. I bolster females who look for employment in fields overwhelmed by men. Actually, I have spent the whole of my childhood living with my father, who runs a grocery stall from home than I did with my mother who works as a teacher. However as indicated by these outcomes, I display direct sexism.
I have two opinions about why my outcomes diverted out so not quite the same as what I trust I feel about careers and gender. This might be so since I am influenced by broad media depictions of females as homemakers and the males as businesspersons, and additionally friends’ folks whose family progression were more stereotypical (Lilienfeld and Irwin 156).
I feel as if the IAT is indicating to a greater extent a cultural relationship than my actual attitude. In the United States, we see more businessmen than businesswomen. It does not be that as it may imply that I figure just men should be business people (Lilienfeld and Irwin 168). I may relate them decently just on the grounds that in our way of life one is more typical than the other.

Imperatively, the IAT made me contemplate prejudice and stereotypes. Presuming these outcomes are right, it makes it clearer that prejudice and stereotype is not the very same thing. Stereotypes are not negative; they are basically systems for the way we display things. While prejudice against females is having careers, I question that I would not be in class right presently endeavoring to excel, seeking a promising profession and not investing energy pondering about raising a family. I support my female companions that they can work for similar things men work for.
Work cited
Lilienfeld, Scott O, and Irwin D. Waldman. Psychological Science Under Scrutiny. , 2017. Print.