Homosexual Marriage In The Formation Of The Family

Homosexual marriage in the formation of the family

There is no historical information when the first homosexual was born (whether this woman or man) or when he was the first to confess it. While there are historical facts that relate different events focused on great errors made by humanity due to the lack of materialized understanding in horrifying killings, there is no documentation that gives us information about the biological process that made man a homosexual being.

Given this, always having the person as someone who is entitled and deserves respect either for their thinking, belief or origin, there is a question in me that goes beyond questioning the actions of another if not to question the real logic of thestuff. Can women stop being a woman because her word simply claims to be something else? Or can a man say that he stopped being a man because he thinks he feels like this?

It is important to start with the facts, what can be demonstrated in the first instance, and then reflect on what the person says. In me to think I’m sure that a dog is still a dog simply because he says he is a cat, nor a bird ceases to be that because from one moment to another he claims to be a fish. That is why questioning the limit of things and where it is correct to guarantee thoughts or beliefs when with simple observation you know that it is something else. Is it right to tell an anorexic woman who is fat because she feels she is? I suppose no, although he feels fat and you see that he is skinny and that his state of health is deplorable, clearly ethically, saying and accepting her feeling can reach mortal consequences in her health.

Understanding this, it is importantbe accepted due to lack of foundations before everything that has to do with emotions.

The concept of family delivered by doctrines and cultures is different, understanding in father, mother and children, having variations where more than one wife is accepted as a tradition. Homosexual marriage is constantly questioned by transgressing the concept of family when there really is not only one, leaving an ambiguity in what can really be considered as such, a family. From there, to be able to have a concrete response to what a family is fundamental, so being clear that there is no certainty in it, it is now when a clear definition could be made, taking into account the modernity and social advances that live thehumanity today.

When we talk about marriage at this time, we still think about creating ties established by law, but I am a faithful believer that this in a time will end, and marriage will cease to be so that freedom before the emotional human feeling is greater thanwhat is already. Gay marriage? It’s like asking to modernize something that already, even modernized, would remain obsolete.

There are diverse variants to consider, how to understand homosexuality and how to understand family. When I try to understand the first thing I conclude that you can judge what you see, but not what you feel, being able to clearly question what the person says to be when his biology says otherwise, but accepting what he says he feels for another person. And when trying to understand the second the ease of concluding that family is nothing more than something relative, the fact that it has to take so long to understand what is simple, the family is what youYou want to form.