Policy Monitoring Vs. Policy Evaluation Comparison Coursework Example

Name
Instructor
Course
Date

Policy Monitoring Versus Policy Evaluation
Policy monitoring is identified as the procedure by which the pertinent stakeholders execute through following and assessing policies with regards to approval, development, enacting, and implementation as intended. Policy evaluation is the intention and systematic appraisal based on a completed or an on-going project, design, strategy or programme, execution, and results. The goal of evaluation is a determination of the fulfillment and significance of the objectives, effectiveness, progress efficiency, sustainability, and impact.
Similarly, both policies ensure effectiveness in associations by ensuring there is better than harm (Caroline et al. 296). The policies’ efficiencies assist in the utilization of the public utilities for utmost output. Both policies service orientation, accountability, trust, and democracy help in meeting individual’s expectations, transparency, restoring of trust in public services and enhancing the democratic progression respectively.
However, timing in policy monitoring is incessant all through the project while policy evaluation makes reviewing at a specific point in the cycle of the project or change of phase (Caroline et al. 296). The scope of policy monitoring involves outputs, day to day activities, changes, and indicators of progress while policy evaluation determines the large delivery of the progress and outputs towards goals and objectives. Besides, the policy monitoring main participants include project users and staff while policy evaluation includes facilitators, scheme staff, external evaluators, and donors.

The policy monitoring process involves regular meetings, monthly quarterly reassessments, and interviews while the policy evaluation entails the additional collection of data exercises and extraordinary meetings. The policy monitoring written outputs have regular updates and reports to the project users while policy evaluation entails a written report with suggestions for changes to the project.
To conclude, the most applicable policy for the criminal justice system is the evaluation. This is enabled through distinguishing in the course of the process, ex-ante, and impact evaluation. The policy distinguishes between systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and realistic synthesis.
Works Cited
Stem, Caroline, et al. “Monitoring and evaluation in conservation: a review of trends and approaches.” Conservation Biology 19.2 (2005): 295-309.