Research paper
Words: 275
Pages: 1
124
124
DownloadStudent’s Name
Professor’s Name
Mountaintop Removal
Date
Introduction
Mountaintop removal is one method of mining which involves removal of mountain summit by use of explosives to expose underneath coal seams. In the recent past, mountaintop removal has received mixed reactions and arguments on its validity. The paper explores to identify pros and cons associated with mountaintop removal and give personal stand on the matter.
Advantages
According to Bernhardt, Mountaintop mining offers a cheaper way of coal extraction compared to other methods such as traditional tunnel digging. Moutain removal mining saves on effort and time. Explosives expose vast volumes of coal with minimal effort and time. The mined coal from mountaintop removal helps in releasing high energy demand. Demand for energy has gone up by significant margins due to increased population and industries requiring power in accomplishing their various activities. Others in support of coal mining through mountaintop removal argue that coal energy if safer than other fossil energy.
Disadvantages
According to Palmer, mountaintop removal results to a lot of negative impacts to the society and environment. Mountaintop removal fills up streams and leaves vast acres of land bare where trees cannot re-grow. Explosives used at mine sites during mining damage foundations of nearby homes. According to Lindberg, other negative impacts of mountaintop removal involve drying of water wells, a decline in aquatic species and birds due to environmental pollution, and exposing the large population to safety and health hazards.
Wait! Research paper paper is just an example!
Conclusion
Mountaintop removal has its advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, there need to be efforts to strick a balance between the two forces and minimize adverse negative impacts. Personal stand on the matter opposes mountaintop removal because it results in more harm than good wounding Mother Nature which supports the life of every being.
Works cited
Bernhardt, Emily S., and Margaret A. Palmer. “The environmental costs of mountaintop mining valley fill operations for aquatic ecosystems of the Central Appalachians.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1223.1 (2011): 39-57.
Lindberg, T. Ty, et al. “Cumulative impacts of mountaintop mining on an Appalachian watershed.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108.52 (2011): 20929-20934.
Palmer, Margaret A., et al. “Mountaintop mining consequences.” Science 327.5962 (2010): 148-149.
Subscribe and get the full version of the document name
Use our writing tools and essay examples to get your paper started AND finished.