Rules of Conduct Concerning Judicial Matters

Name
Professor’s Name
Course
DateRules of Conduct Concerning Judicial Matters
During our field trip to the courthouse, I learned several things about passing judgments during a trial. I determined that a judge can make different rulings against several plaintiffs tried together, and they had final say about the verdict even in jury trials. Moreover, I learned that a defendant must file the motion to reduce the decision rendered within 10 days which can only be heard by the presiding judge in their case. The same condition also applies for any motions for new trials, but such proposals must also specify the particular grounds that warrant the new court case. Furthermore, I gained insight into the process of filing an appeal including the petition period, the parties who may file the appeal, and the stipulations involving the new appeal period.
As expected, all the attorneys involved in the cases possessed legal skills and were fully prepared during the trial. They examined the witnesses and structured their questions to emphasize the guilt or innocence of the defendant depending on their role. Moreover, as expected the jury was comprised of 12 members, who were all dressed formally, and regularly took notes as the witnesses gave their testimonies. Nevertheless, what surprised me most was the minimal use of precedent as the attorneys argued their cases. The little reference substantiated the notion that the role of any trial is to allow the judicial authorities to discuss, question, and then make a decision based on the evidence presented.

My best learning moments from the Official 2018 Connecticut Practice Book involve gaining insight into jury trials, conduct during juvenile matters, and the writs of error. I enjoyed discovering the activities involving jury trials, and the different steps that should be taken in the event of a deadlocked or biased jury (The Commission on Official Legal Publications 244). Jury trials provide a chance for the defendant to argue their case in front of a panel of their peers. Furthermore, I found the sections that covered procedures involving juveniles in a court of law interesting. I learned that a minor can give a telephonic testimony and that children involved in a legal battle should still be insured by their guardians’ coverage plans (The Commission on Official Legal Publications 312). Lastly, I had fun reading about writs of error, and the applicable procedure following such an event.
Work Cited
The Commission on Official Legal Publications. Official 2018 Connecticut Practice Book. Connecticut, 2018.