Order Now

See Below

Category:

0 / 5. 0

Words: 275

Pages: 1

135

Interesting Science
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Interesting science has its basic roots in the guidelines of conducting proper research. In addition, it sticks to the rules of validity and reliability ensuring that it contains words of scientific truth. The article, Interesting Science by Gray & Wegner, outlines the necessities for one to come up with interesting research which is core in the field of interesting science.
The basic claims made in this paper are guidelines that should be followed by a researcher when coming up with a research paper. More so, in agreement with the basic claims made, it’s of absolute importance to note that the guidelines for interesting research have been outlined giving an overview of each step and its importance in making the paper a success and interesting. There is a varied human experience whereby little of it counts for interesting psychology (Gray & Wegner 2012). Imagining the best case scenario and avoiding the obvious outcome makes research interesting.
Phenomena as used by the author in the masterpiece of Interesting science tries to bring about the importance of an individual in a particular situation trying to avoid thinking about a specific situation therein. This helps one get a clear view of the situation one is avoiding in mind as ideas will come following with connection to reality. When somebody tries to avoid thinking about something, they eventually start thinking about it because of the inability to control the mind.

Wait! See Below paper is just an example!

In addition, the inability to suppress thoughts cannot be deleted in the mind even in the face of false information (Gray & Wegner 2012). The more a person tries to avoid thinking about something the more it comes to their minds.
The list suggestion of phenomena first is a surprise in the sense that it’s commonly known that one has to think about something for them to have a better understanding of it but not by avoiding to think about what’s in question.

References
Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2012). Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley.

Get quality help now

Natalie Griffin

5.0 (391 reviews)

Recent reviews about this Writer

Your writing team is beyond incredible! I’m absolutely happy with the law paper I received.

View profile

Related Essays