Social work assessment process

Name:
Course:
Instructor:
Date:
Social work assessment process most important step
The practice of social work assessment is executed in different steps. The tasks engaged are meaningful, but I believe that the act of adjusting rather purposing to improve on the programs after the assessment of the results as per the learning outcomes is the most important task within the entire process of assessment. It is a fact that the assessment results obtained will remain worthless if at all they are no longer used. It sounds useless to obtain the views of children about the terrorist attack which lead to loss of friends and relatives and fail to provide a subsequent program to counsel them. Indeed, this is a critical step noticed in the assessment process. The step acts as the controller of the process because if the obtained results fail to lead to the required improvements or adjustments in the program, then the assessment process would have failed in achieving its primary goal (Durlak 410).
Children are under development, and they need a concentrated program which will enable them to develop positivity in life and do away with the psychosocial act affecting them. The adolescents are at the level of behaving and starting to make decisions on their own. Adjusting of the intervention program will guide the adolescents on how to make decisions that won’t hurt or affect their lives. Families stand to foster the implementation of the change planned towards managing the situation. Families may volunteer towards benefiting every single member.

Adults and older adults need support because their development is at an optimum. They require an action that will empower their stay and cope up with the surroundings. Therefore, the provisioned adjustments to improve the program should get disseminated keenly to achieve the optimal assessment results.
Work cited
Durlak, Joseph A., et al. “The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta‐analysis of school‐based universal interventions.” Child development 82.1 (2011): 405-432.