The Way The Characters Influence The Protagonist

The way the characters influence the protagonist

Introduction

At present, it is evident that the context in which we live influences our way of thinking which also means that on the one hand we have to see in other people, that is, that we are also influential in someone’s life and in this case ofaccording to the social context;It is stated that we usually have a relationship with different people around our entire life, which implies that we will once have to intervene in their opinions, points of view among many others, since we do not always keep aside according to the type of person who isAnd this is above all it is announced in the families where we influence so that facts that we want or in a glass are carried out to what we believe correct;The work house written by Henrik Ibsen of dramatic gender which denotes a psychological content, which was written when at that time there were revolutions that developed throughout Europe. Therefore it is affirmed that secondary characters influence the protagonist of Henrik Ibsen’s dollhouse. 

Developing

In the plot of the work the author addresses the issues of machismo against feminism based on what is represented by the characters where Helmer has a very affectionate personality towards Nora who, when receiving this affection, changes his personality being sweeter and almost conceited, and although this action can be analyzed is not correct for the age of Nora, due to the immaturity that shows from Helmer which had a sexist thought and this denoted by the treatment and indirects that he usually mentions in the course of the entireplot where the author uses one of its romantic-transitional artistic stages;

The prototype of a woman influenced by the character Helmer to Nora, allows her to realize that she is living a fantasy;as observed in the following appointment:

Helmer: (from your office) Is my all -bristle?

Nora: (while opening some packages.) Yes, she is.

Helmer: My squirrel has arrived for a long time? (…)

Helmer: (who goes after her.) Well well;I don’t want to see my all -fallen wings. What, does my squirrel?

And having been able to denote in evidence implies that through the different types of phrases or suffixes that Helmer used to Nora as "squirrel or allon" confuses it by making him believe that the reality in which he lives is pink, whereIt does not take into account reality and believes to live in a society which do not influence too much, in addition this type of treatment by Helmer also causes Nora to have a very childish behavior which could refer in this way that the protagonist wants to train as the protagonist asone wishes, or for convenience. Likewise, this act would bring consequences that would eventually be affecting everyone, since it can be deduced that Nora is being seated, as similar situations also occur today.

Krogstad on behalf of consciousness in Nora’s life for her ignorance and rebellion, through the following appointment:

Krogstad: Tell me, Madam, do you remember, by chance, the date of your father’s death? (…)

Krogstad: It is surprising, Madam, that her father signed the document three days after her death (…)

Nora: (After a short pause, he disdigns his head and looks at him with resolution.No, it wasn’t him. I was myself who wrote Dad’s name.

We see that Mr. Krogstad begins with a narrative dialogue reminding him of an event happened a long time ago where Nora made a non -legal task that later if he got to reveal would have judicial problems, so Nora would be forced to do what KrogstadI asked, that is, threatened, however, her ignorance in the face of conflicts does not allow her to be aware of her actions showing an attitude of rebellion by exposing her immaturity in adverse situations, we can also denote that she acts with emotion and not withReason before the consequences of our acts leading us to be ignorant and make decisions regarding rebellion. Then it is reaffirmed that Nora acted unconsciously showing rebellion and ignorance.

Dr. Rank as the stimulant of the different and mature reaction that Nora had after wanting to perform an indecent action before him, evidenced by appointment:

Nora: (…) Sit here Doctor;I’m going to teach you one thing.

Doctor Rank: (Sitting) What is?

Nora: Look

Doctor Rank: Silk stockings.

Nora: Meat color. Aren’t they beautiful? (…) Contemplate the entire average.

Doctor Rank: Hum!

Nora: I no longer teach him anything else, for daring.

According to the evidence, it is shown that Nora would intend to perform an indecent action, showing himself to fulfilling it, but after noticing that Dr. Rank does not show any idea of what could happen: Doctor Rank: I have no reason founded to comment on thatparticular … we can mention that Nora meant that he would be bad before the doctor and did this expression: Nora: I no longer teach him anything else, for daring. Also showing fidelity to Helmer, which we can identify as a responsible and mature attitude. Therefore it is reaffirmed that Nora acted differently showing responsibility and above all respect to her husband as already mentioned.

Mrs. Linde as a representation of ethics in Nora’s life who would make a definitive decision, as observed:

Nora: (suffocated, whispering.) What’s up?

Mrs. Linde: (In a low voice.) I talked to him.

Nora: And what?

Mrs. Linde: Nora … you must tell your husband everything.

We can notice that Mrs. Linde interferes with Nora giving mention with the word ‘you mustIgnore it, this due to all the behavior that it showed throughout the plot, but after the influence of Mrs. Linde;Nora with the expression "Nora: (with fainted accent.) I knew it… 

It shows acceptance of what was doing badConsciousness in this small fragment was surprising, since Nora always showed himself with characteristics of rebellion, which could have thought that he could not act in a mature way. Thus, it is affirmed that Nora becomes aware, taking into account the way in which Mrs. Linde’s words should act, this due to ethics.

conclusion

In conclusion, the work house written by Henrik Ibsen shows that secondary characters influence the protagonist of the work either in decision making, views and even influence the values. So one of the characters that is Helmer was manipulating with different types of expressions to Nora, since it should be noted that in those times in the 19th centuries there was machismo;Another of the characters, Krogstad who tried to manipulate Nora generating awareness in her;Also, Dr. Rank who during the plot generated different reactions of the protagonist.

On the other hand, one of the characters is Mrs. Linde, which can be affirmed that she did represent ethics showing Nora as was the way she had to act in that situation in which she was subjected. Finishing, this work with dramatic plot relating it to today could be denotMaking them think that everything goes normally to be able to do whatever for them, even this in the same way leads to having to put aside the values, today many women shut up when it comes to them, when they really believeSomeone, lie aside the comments which is not taken into account by some men. Today’s society has not changed much, and in the same work it shows how it was in previous years;The woman was like a "doll" and in certain cases she still is so, everything has an end where we see reality.