Youth Violence and Video Games revised

Student’s Name
Instructor’s Name
Course
Date
Youth Violence and Video Games
Introduction
Violent video games affect how teens think and act. Violent video games include the destruction of property, killing police, mass shooting, and other acts that could be considered bloody, but the game designers never show the teens how these games affect other people. Teen violence has become a social issue in many parts of the world. Therefore, the most significant problem with the video games is that they affect youth’s perception of violence and they may end up acting what they play. The most practical solution to this problem would be moving the computer and the gaming tools in public places such as a living room in the homes so to ensure that the parents monitor what their children play.
Violent Video Game Problem
According to Violent Video Games Linked To Child Aggression (np), the aggressive behavior was evident in the teens who habitually played violent video games. The ones who played the violent computer games indicated an aggressive attitude towards others. The aggressiveness was primarily linked to the games that involved dismemberment or graphic murdering. The violent thoughts included imagining hitting a person they hated, or someone who was hostile to them. It is also including thinking that it would be right for someone to beat another in case they wronged them. However, games also have therapeutic value, and they cannot be entirely associated with the negativities of youth violence.

For instance, the video games increase the esteem of the players as they move from one level to another as teens feel that they can now solve life problems. And, therefore, with parents monitoring what their children spend time on can help in solving the problem of violent video games.
Pro and Con One
Parents have little control over the type of games that their teen children play. This is despite their awareness of the negative implication of some video games that are available in the market. The meaningful question most scholars ask is whether the parents should be allowed to control the type of the computer games their children play (Durlak, Mahoney, and Bohnert). This could involve managing the amount of time the teens behind the screen playing a game. However, there are also raising issues on the extent to which the parents should be involved in if their involvement will reduce youth violence and improve academic performance. It could be argued that it is reasonable for a parent to make sure that their children understand the difference between game fantasy and reality, and only then can video games be considered an educational tool.
Pro and Con Two
When the video game gadgets are in a public place, it will be possible for the parents to watch what their children are playing and can even play with them. Without an adult involvement, the youth can spend much time playing these games, and likely escalate the problem of violence. Lack of social skills could cause this behavior. However, with playing with the parent in sight, the teens will be taught the necessary interpersonal skills which will improve how they interact with other people. However, the question of whether the parents should observe their children as they play video games is contentious. This is because the teens and young adults will desire to play computer games irrespective of whether they contain violent graphics. Parent’s interference with what their children like might bring strain in their relationship which might consequently cause more harm to the child. Parent’s involvement might even reduce the player’s game performance, which is likely to hurt their feelings and thus affect their esteem. Therefore, the concern in this matter is the extent to which the parents can control their children as they play the game on their watch.
Pro and Con Three
Playing the computer games in a public place allows the parents to engage their children on why they think playing games is important. This could be a pathway to promoting a talent of a teen, especially when they realize that their parents approve their actions. Most game designers were once prolific game players. Therefore, with the parent’s knowledge of the kind of game one is playing, it is not necessary to restrict them, but to make sure that the teens understand what they are doing. Once asked a question about a particular game and how it works, a young adult might be interested in researching about it to prove that they know what they are doing and its benefits. This could be further encouraged by the parent’s restriction on a specific game until the child describes what the game is about, how it is made, and why it should be played by other people. Nevertheless, this could be impossible if a young adult is not interested in the gaming industry, and is just playing for fun. Under such conditions, a child may opt for other activities which will be done without the monitoring of their parents- and these activities might be harmful than letting a teen play a game with liberty and in their private rooms.
Pro and Con Four
Playing video games in a public place also ensures that a teen is not spending time which was otherwise supposed to something else. Parents who are anxious and emotional will keep their children from playing aggressive computer games (“Parents Influence Children’s Play Of Violent Video Games”). It is possible for a teen to spend his or her entire day playing the game and forget about their chores and even their personal hygiene. Overdoing it makes a youth lose a sense of responsibility both to themselves and others. This could explain why some of them turn to violent actions without taking responsibility for their actions, which could arise from arguments from something they did or did not do and they resort to violence if confronted. When the playing tools are in the public place, the parents will always ensure that their children are doing the right thing at the right time and video games are only played during free time. However, there is a limitation to this situation. Computer game tools could be in a public place, but parents will always have other things to attend to other than sitting to watch what kind of games their children play. When the parents are not in the house, the young adults can still waste much time playing unimportant games instead of doing constructive things.
Pro and Con Five
When the parents are aware of the type of games that their children are playing, they can also be willing to spend money on buying the games. Most teens’ expendable income come from their parents, and thus parents can exercise control over the type of games to be played under their watch. Since the young adults will be afraid to be denied money for purchasing the game, they will not opt for a violent or uncomfortable game. The parents could also be willing to pay for the game if also take part in playing it, and to promote positive social behavior; they are likely to opt for decent games which do not involve dismembering someone or violent graphics. This aspect, however, is not a guarantee that teens will not have violent games on their devices. Most parents might be comfortable with their teen children playing violent games, which might be partly because they think it is fun or they are not aware of the psychological effects associated with the violent games.
Pro and Con Six
Further, setting the playing joint in a public place will also educate parents. Parents will be forced to research on a wide variety of video games to know which to or not approve in their home. This would also ensure that parents only allow learning games instead of actual games. It is unlikely that parents would let their children play violent games, primarily because they lack the learning aspect. This would, however, add burden to a parent and spend time that could otherwise be used in family development. Therefore, it becomes imperative if the parent feels that the games are not having any educative and therapeutic benefit to their children to restrict them in their house.
Conclusion
From the analysis, it is clear that parents can exercise a significant degree of control over the kind of games their children play. This can be made possible if they place the playing tools in public places such as a living room where they will be able to monitor their teens as they play. Therefore, while violent video games have become a menace, this approach is one of the many solutions that could be utilized to reduce the aggressiveness caused by the games. Parents can work and walk with their children to ensure that their game-playing does not turn to their antisocial, irresponsible, and unfocused lifestyle which might affect how they interact with their schoolmates and other members in the society. They should ensure that their children only benefit from these games. However, they should also consider their actions so as not to put a strain on their relationships with teens.
Works Cited
Durlak, J. A., et al. “Developing and improving after-school programs to enhance youth’s personal growth and adjustment: A special issue of AJCP .” American Journal of Community Psychology (2010): 285-93.
“Parents Influence Children’s Play of Violent Video Games.” ScienceDaily. N.p., 2018.
Web. 9 Feb. 2018.
“Violent Video Games Linked To Child Aggression – CNN.Com.” Edition.cnn.com. N.p., 2018.
Web. 9 Feb. 2018.