Alignment of Research Components

Alignment of Research Components
Name
Institution

Alignment of Research Components
The criteria that that can be used to assess the arrangement of various components of research would be the sequential development approach. In this case, there are set of standards utilized and developed by the test developers as a guideline to follow the structure and content. There is always the need for the data and the material to flow sequentially. Through this approach the research would flow in a logical process, thus ensuring that the analysis can be understood with much ease.
Social change might take difference models. However, the various model of evolution would depend on several factors, and one of these factors is acquired research and knowledge. For change to be effected there is always need for the increase of awareness and public participation. However, the importance of knowledge would only be felt if the knowledge that is acquired from the various sources is impactful to the society. Experience is the basis of change in the community when people are knowledgeable they would have a more significant impact in bringing about change in the organization. Often, people might resist changing their approaches to issues because those do not understand the reason and the effect of the change. However, in most cases, people expect the difference in the society yet they do not provide the knowledge that can orchestrate the move. However, acquired research play the critical role of fast educating the community, and after delivering the education, it goes ahead to become an agent of change (Chabbi, & Loescher, 2017).

Research thus plays a vital role in the society. The well-aligned analysis would thus be the best approach to bring about change in the community. Therefore, as the society seeks for better ways to bring about change it would be essential to focus more on research methodologies.

Reference
Chabbi, A., & Loescher, H. W. (2017). The Lack of Alignment among Environmental Research Infrastructures May Impede Scientific Opportunities. Challenges, 8(2), 18.